The extra 4.6 bet units may not be worth the bother of learning a different strategy. That will lower the actual return to 1.007534 and decrease the royal probability to 1 in 46415, resulting in an expected profit of 46415 ×(1.007534-1) = 349.68. In this case, the profit is maximized by following a strategy based on a royal win of 450. For a greater overall expected profit, I recommend using a less aggressive royal strategy to increase the total hands played. Normally the return is 1.00762 and a royal hits once every 45282 hands. Let’s look at full pay deuces wild, for example.

Is that enough to hurt these pay tables, or are they playable? (they seem decent at least) Thank you in advance Micheal. No royal bonus for 5 coins bet (simply 2,500 for royal on 5 coins)Īgain all of these have no bonuses for max coins in Royal Flush. Can you tell me what you think about these tables, and if they should be played or not. I found a few new video poker machines with what I consider to be a non-usual paytable. A follow up question would be, if they do indeed shuffle at regular casino intervals, can a player assume that if he enters a private table that he beings with a full shoe? Thanks again for your great web site, and I look forward to your response to my questions. Also, do you know, among the majority who do not, which shuffle after each hand and which just do not advise of a shuffle (although it actually occurs after many hands)? It would be great to have this knowledge. Secondly, I am wondering which, if any, online casinos currently advise the player of a shuffle in blackjack (multi-deck, of course). If you have indeed devised a unique playing strategy for each pay out schedule, would you mind sharing that info with us? Otherwise, the probability of forming any hand should be the same in that type of game, no matter what the pay outs are. Why would this discrepancy exist? It seems that the only possibility is that the game is being played with a different strategy. For example, on the first jacks or better chart, the probability of forming a three-of-a-kind is 0.074344, but on the second that same probability is listed as 0.074449. I have noticed in your tables of probabilities and expected returns for video poker, that the probabilities (and corresponding number of hands) for each hand vary for the same type (jacks or better, for example) from one pay out chart to another. First of all, thanks for your very informative, comprehensive, and overall helpful site.

Are the five kind in video poker